Not sure how Rovers have had their hands forced on this (or the RFL). Care to explain?

I can't, I apologise.



Not sure what your agenda is here Chris28, as you will have read from my posts on other parts of the site, I know nothing of the inner machinations of what's going on and anything I've posted has mainly been posted on what you've said, because you know what you're talking about and what Kosh has said, because it would appear he has a credible inside line.



I'd love to explain, but I can't, as I've already stated over on the Rovers' board, I have no knowledge of anything.



I'm not responsible for my club, I've merely turned up, bought a ticket and enjoyed the rugby league for the last thirty years.



We've fought our way back from the brink, but for me, my club keeps pushing things too far.



I openly accept that my view can be quite correctly criticised.

Link?







Gloating?





Still waiting.....

Erm, Jamie Thakery anyone?

He's definitely a fake account. Damn, I have accidentally repeated your mistake of adding an extra ac and o

yeah, just the same scenario this one. Well done and congratulations

You really were dropped on your head as a small child weren't you

As I replied last night before being banned for calling Rovers a Joke, yes I was. YOu on the other hand have probably been kicked repeatedly in the head. Maybe even by one of your players.

good post.

Banned for the truth...mental times





Bet we all know who banned you

In that case I feel for you.



Because it happened about 2 years ago. And at the time i said it was a stupid concession to lazy short-term thinking. We have too many overseas players. There is no need for us to have the same amount this season as last. Wigan have too many.



There are no rules in the operational rules which i would let clubs not abide by in this circumstance. Hull KR have made their bed by trying to use loopholes to squeeze in an extra overseas player by using a passport of convenience. Im not sure why we should be granting dispensation to expedite this.





You think 10 overseas players, with 6 counting on the quota isnt stockpiling? you think that taking one of the quota whilst injured replacing him with another, then taking that player of the quota and adding the previous one isnt developing a carousel.



I have never said i would be happy if it was exceptional, you have simply made that up. I have said it is exceptional as in not common, not exceptional in deserving dispensation.



And again, its a very simply concept. Hull KR have (or are planning on) breaking the rules. They have apparently asked for dispensation to do so which it has been indicated they will be given. If they werent breaking the rules, why would they need to ask for or receive dispensation?







I have no interest in your nonsense false dichotomy. Your either/or situation simply doesnt apply in the real world.



Things that are uncommon dont by their definition of simply being uncommon deserve discussion of the RFL board with a view to granting dispensation. By being uncommon (or exceptional) it simply means it doesnt happen very often.



Things which do deserve discussion by the RFL board with a view to granting a dispensation would be things which were exceptional as in so far beyond the realms of normality as to represent a situation not covered by the existing rules. This situation clearly is not one of those.



Now i cant be the first one to have taught you this, but to sum up what seems to be your confusion and why you keep bringing up your nonsense false dichotomies, as Robert Plant said, "'Cause you know sometimes words have....Two meanings"

No agenda and no criticism of you - apologies if it came across like that. I was just intrigued that you thought Rovers had been [uforced[/u into the Mason arrival and deregistering of Dobson. IMO they've taken advantage of Dobson's injury to get Mason here and playing. No compulsion to do it, just that the timing worked for them.