Yeah, it was called for obstruction but as you say that rule is getting milked a bit by players who realise they've been caught out of position and instead of pushing off the runner and sliding across when they realise they've been caught out, it's easier to milk the penalty and go for the obstruction, it also got sent up as a no try which seems to be the be all and end all. Tbh I didn't see that one as good as the Johnstone one that got chalked off and for me, everyone looked onside at the kick from the angles they showed on the big screen, I haven't a clue if we didn't see an angle but it looked a good try to me. For the first one that got chalked off you could see that a couple of players were a bit in front of Russell when he kicked.

And again

It was noticeable how much the ruck was slowed in the second half compared to the first and I think it was a tactical change from Hull. It worked, they took their chances. The 50-50 plays come off in another game, but overall I was pleased with our game. 


Rourke looked great in attack and comfortable under the high ball, but I think we missed Jowitt's passing skills to create the space. I was surprised how easily he got skinned by Chamberlain,  which again I think Jowitt would've covered that. 


Add Vagana, Jowitt and Stornton into that team I think the result would be different. 

It rewards lazy defence but the fools in the refereeing society buy it, very annoying 

Lazy defence getting rewarded, I bet the double glazing salesman loves it when they knock at a referee’s door