How can a knock on be 'slight'? It's either knocked on or it isn't. It's like saying it was a 'slight' try, or a 'slight' 40/20.



You lot lost, get over it. We were the better team, you could not penetrate our awesome defence, and the only way you could handle Lauaki was to either albow him in the tackle in his head, head butt him, drag his neck back, or have 3-4 men on him and still a late man comes on with the elbow! He still knocked half of them on their s!



Well done Agar for defending him, saying exactly the truth.

not the only one!!

You also won a game with a not so slight knock on against Cas, do you want it all your own way all the time?

I really don't think FC fans should be talking about the easier fixtures this year..

But Saints was

The part of Agars article that concerns me is that he seems to be under the impression that Lauaki can count to 10.

Clearly cheap shots are popular in east hull

As long as he can count to 6 thats all that matters

Isn't the point here that Lauaki did actually prove to be a big distraction for Rovers during the game? Singling a player out for rough treatment by definition means you take that energy away from other parts of your game. So perhaps when Newton says he "refuses to apologise" for these rather transparent tactics, it's the Rovers fans he should be apologising to as they played a part in Hull's victory.

yes he did, and if he keeps jumping up fists flying then hell keep getting illegily hit, lets face it, the guy is an animal, teams are gonna do whatever they have to do to get the better of him, and if that means play for a reaction then thats what they will do, what team wouldnt?

no you lost because we scored MORE points than you

Deary me.